极地船舶冰区航行性能的试验预报技术发展现状

doi:10.19423/j.cnki.31-1561/u.2023.01.087

船舶 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (01): 87-97.DOI: 10.19423/j.cnki.31-1561/u.2023.01.087

• 极地装备设计、检验、建造与运维管理 • 上一篇下一篇

极地船舶冰区航行性能的试验预报技术发展现状

黄焱^1,2,3, 孙剑桥^2,*, 田育丰^1,2

1.天津大学水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室天津 300350;
2.天津大学建筑工程学院天津 300350;
3.天津大学港口与海洋工程天津市重点实验室天津 300350

收稿日期:2022-09-14 修回日期:2022-09-27 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-03-06
通讯作者: 孙剑桥（1991-）,男,博士,助理研究员。研究方向：冰力学与冰工程学。田育丰（1986-）,男,博士,教授/硕士生导师。研究方向：冰力学与冰工程学。
作者简介:黄焱（1978-）,男,博士,教授/博士生导师。研究方向：冰力学与冰工程学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（52101327）; 工信部高技术船舶科研项目（2021-342）

State-of-the-Art of Experimental Prediction of Sailing Performance for Polar Ships in Ice Regions

HUANG Yan^1,2,3, SUN Jianqiao^2,*, TIAN Yufeng^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China;
3. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Port and Ocean Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China

Received:2022-09-14 Revised:2022-09-27 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对于极地船舶而言,其设计建造必须依据先验性的冰区航行安全性能认识,而目前国际上可以借鉴的实船航行经验极度匮乏,这就必须借助有效可靠的预报方法。当前海冰力学与工程学的发展仍处于机理性探索阶段,因此,在理论方法与数值模拟上尚难以形成对冰区航行性能进行可靠预报的方法。据此,国际学术界和工程界已形成共识,冰水池模型试验是当前预报与评估船舶冰区航行性能的唯一可靠途径。文中从阻力、快速性与操纵性3个方面,对极地船舶冰区航行性能的试验预报技术发展现状进行介绍,并对其中的关键技术进行梳理,以期为业界充分了解冰水池试验测试技术提供借鉴。

关键词: 极地船舶, 冰阻力, 快速性, 操纵性, 冰池试验

Abstract: The design and construction of polar ships rely on the prior knowledge of the safety of ships sailing in ice regions. However, the current available trial data and experience in ice regions are extremely insufficient in the world, which requires the development of effective and reliable prediction methods. The current development of sea ice mechanics and engineering is still far from maturity. It is therefore difficult to form a reliable method for the performance prediction of ships sailing in ice regions based on theoretical analysis and numerical simulation. Therefore, it has been accepted by the international academia and industry that the ice tank testing is the only reliable way to predict and assess the performance of ships sailing in ice regions. The state-of-the-art of the experimental prediction of performance for polar ships sailing in ice regions is introduced from three aspects of resistance, propulsion and manoeuvrability. And the key technologies are reviewed to provide references for the industry to fully understand the ice tank testing techniques.

Key words: polar ship, ice resistance, resistance and propulsion, manoeuvrability, ice tank testing

中图分类号:

黄焱, 孙剑桥, 田育丰. 极地船舶冰区航行性能的试验预报技术发展现状[J]. 船舶, 2023, 34(01): 87-97.

HUANG Yan, SUN Jianqiao, TIAN Yufeng. State-of-the-Art of Experimental Prediction of Sailing Performance for Polar Ships in Ice Regions[J]. Ship & Boat, 2023, 34(01): 87-97.

参考文献

[1] RISKA K.Ship-ice interaction in ship design: Theory and practice [R]. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Cold Regions Science and Marine Technology, 2010.
[2] FSICR. Ice Class Regulations and the Application Thereof (Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Regulations)[S]. Finnish Transport Safety Agency, Helsinki, Finland, 2017.
[3] ISO 19906. Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries-Arctic Offshore StructuresSO 19906. Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries-Arctic Offshore Structures[S]. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2010.
[4] Aker Arctic.50 years of ice model testing[R]. Helsinki: Aker Arctic Technology Inc., 2019.
[5] ITTC. General Guidance and Introduction to Ice Model Testing[S]. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 7.5-02-04-01, 2021.
[6] TIMCO G W, BURDEN R P.An analysis of the shapes of sea ice ridges[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 1997, 25:65-77.
[7] 史庆增, 徐继祖, 宋安. 冰力模型实验[J]. 冰川冻土, 1990(2):117-123.
[8] ITTC. Guidelines for Modelling of Complex Ice Environments[S]. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 7.5-02-04-03, 2021.
[9] HUANG Y, SUN J, LI W.Experimental observations of the flexural failure process of snow covered ice[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2016, 129:14-30.
[10] 黄焱, 孙剑桥, 田育丰. POD推进极地航行油船冰水池模型试验试验报告[R]. 天津:天津大学冰力学与冰工程实验室, 2018.
[11] JONES S J.Ships in Ice-A Review[C]//25th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. St. John’s. Canada, 2004.
[12] KASHTELJAN V I, POZNYAK I I, RYVLIN A Y.Ice resistance to motion of a ship[M]. Leningrad:Marine Computer Applicetion Corpration, 1969.
[13] EDWARDS R Y, LEMS J W, WHEATON J W.et al.Full-scale and model tests of a Great Lakes icebreaker[C]//Transaction of SNAME. 1972:170-207.
[14] VANCE G P. A scaling system for ships modelled in ice [C]//Proceding SNAME Ice Torwhgy. Symposium, 1975, Montreal, Paper H1:28.
[15] ENKVIST E.On the ice resistance encountered by ships operating in the continuous mode of icebreaking [R]. Finland:The Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences in Finland, Report No. 24:181, 1972.
[16] ENKVIST E.A survey of experimental indications of the relation between the submersion and breaking components of level ice resistance to ships[C]// Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions. 1983:484-493.
[17] ETTEMA R, STERN F, LAZARO J.Dynamics of continuous-mode icebreaking by a polar-class icebreaker hull [R]. Technical Report 24, United States Department of Transportation and University of Iowa, 1987.
[18] ETTEMA R, MATSUISHI M, KITAZAWA T.Influence of ice-rubble size on resistance to ship-hull motion through a thick layer of ice rubble[C]//The 8th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions. 1985:787-796.
[19] GLEN I F, JONES S J, PATERSON R B, et al.Comparative testing of four bow designs for an icebreaking Navaids vessel[J]. Marine Technology, 1998(4): 200-218.
[20] LEIVISKÄ T.Ship’s ridge resistance in model ice[C]// The 15th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions. 1999:600-611.
[21] JUURMAA K, MATTSSON T, WILKMAN G.The Development of the New Double Acting Ships for Ice Operations[C]// POAC. Ottawa, Canada, 2001:719-728.
[22] LEIVISKÄ T, TUHKURI J, RISKA K.Model tests on Resistance in Ice-free Ice Channels[C]// POAC. Ottawa, Canada, 2001:881-892.
[23] HERREROS M A, EVERS K, RIOLA J M, et al.Ice model tests for a bulbous bow shaped ship [R]. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Navales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 2005.
[24] MÅRD A. Experimental study of the icebreaking process of an icebreaking trimaran[C]// Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions. Trondheim, Norway, 2005.
[25] MYLAND D, EHLERS S.Influence of bow design on ice breaking resistance[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 119:217-232.
[26] MYLAND D, EHLERS S.Methodology to assess the floe size and distribution along a ship hull during model scale ice tests for self-propelled ships sailing ahead in level ice[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2017(sup1): S100-S108.
[27] LINDQVIST G.A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships[C]//The 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions. 1989:722-735.
[28] 黄思洋. 船舶航行中船体冰载荷分布及演变规律的模型试验研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2017.
[29] HUANG Y, HUANG S, SUN J.Experiments on navigating resistance of an icebreaker in snow covered level ice[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2018, 152: 1-14.
[30] JONES S J, LAU M.Propulsion and maneuvering model tests of the USCGC healy in ice and correlation with full-scale[C]// The 7th International Conference and Exhibition on Performance of Ships and Structures in Ice. Banff, Alberta, Paper No. ICETECH06-104-RF, 2006.
[31] TAMURA K, KATO H, YAMAGUCHI H.Experimental approach to the interaction between nozzle-propeller and ice block[C]// OMAE/POAC Yohohama Proceedings. 1997:109-118.
[32] LEIVISKÄ T.The propulsion of an ice going ship ahead and astern[C]// Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC’03). Trondheim, Norway, 2003.
[33] WANG J, AKINTURK A, BOSE N, et al.Experimental study on a model azimuthing podded propulsor in ice[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2008(13):244-255.
[34] 黄焱, 王定仕, 孙剑桥. 极地船舶典型航行模式下螺旋桨铣冰过程的模型试验[J]. 实验力学, 2020(6): 1003-1013.
[35] 黄焱, 孙剑桥, 黄思洋. 单吊舱推进单元冰载荷模型试验报告[R]. 天津: 天津大学冰力学与冰工程实验室, 2017.
[36] ITTC. Manoeuvring Tests in Ice[S]. 7.5-02-04-02.3, Specialist Committee on Ice of the 29th ITTC, 2021.
[37] 吴炜. 考虑不同漂角的船舶冰阻力模型试验研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2017.
[38] 黄焱, 孙剑桥, 田育丰. CPP推进极地航行油船冰水池模型试验[R]. 天津: 天津大学冰力学与冰工程实验室, 2018.
[39] TUE-FEE K K, KEINONEN A J. Full-scale maneuvering tests in level ice of Canmar Kigoriak and Robert Lemeur[J]. Marine Technology, 1986, 23:131-138.
[40] SAZONOV K E.Turning in ice by the captain’s manoeuvre[C]// Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC’99). Espoo, Finland, 1999.

编辑推荐

Metrics

联系电话：（021）63161688-105006
传真：（021）63151255
E-mail：chuanbo@maric.com.cn

极地船舶冰区航行性能的试验预报技术发展现状

State-of-the-Art of Experimental Prediction of Sailing Performance for Polar Ships in Ice Regions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	曹晶, 王刚. 极地船舶规范及其主要技术发展[J]. 船舶, 2023, 34(01): 61-71.
[2]	胡扬帆, 丁仕风, 刘志兵, 周利, 吴刚, 曹晶. 极地船液舱温度场分析与冻结过程模拟[J]. 船舶, 2023, 34(01): 110-118.
[3]	殷汉军, 刘城, 王其峰. 极地船轴系的强度设计分析[J]. 船舶, 2023, 34(01): 161-174.
[4]	韦红刚, 陈红梅, 张越峰, 曹成杰. 某型极地破冰船的艏部线型优化[J]. 船舶, 2021, 32(05): 17-24.
[5]	刘小健;张晨亮;夏召丹;王大建;范佘明;. 船体后体形状对船舶操纵性的影响研究[J]. 船舶, 2018, 29(05): 93-97.
[6]	邹劲;张元刚;孙寒冰;王瑞宇;. 基于SBD的局部气垫双体船快速性优化设计[J]. 船舶, 2017, 28(05): 9-15.
[7]	殷俊俊;冯正平;刘乐乐;沈权;. 极地海冰环境分析[J]. 船舶, 2017, 28(02): 10-18.
[8]	李思;李允;. 某小型自航绞吸挖泥船快速性研究[J]. 船舶, 2015, 26(06): 13-19.
[9]	常赫斌;李云波;龚家烨;. 小水线面双体船操纵性数值预报方法研究[J]. 船舶, 2015, 26(04): 32-38.
[10]	程维杰;. 大型起重铺管船船型开发[J]. 船舶, 2015, 26(03): 28-34.
[11]	吴刚;张东江;. 极地战略船舶先行[J]. 船舶, 2014, 25(06): 1-8.
[12]	沈文娜;. 恶劣海况下维持操纵性的最小推进功率临时导则浅析[J]. 船舶, 2014, 25(06): 40-46.
[13]	翁欢英;. 小水线面双体船舵面积对操纵性的影响初探[J]. 船舶, 2013, 24(03): 81-84.
[14]	章拯;. 关于高速艇大回转试验的思考[J]. 船舶, 2009, 20(06): 28-29.
[15]	高山;. 大型全垫升气垫船设计初探[J]. 船舶, 2008, 19(04): 1-4.