船舶 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 25-34.DOI: 10.19423/j.cnki.31-1561/u.2023.03.025

• 本期特约 • 上一篇    下一篇

静压作用对吸声覆盖层性能的影响与分析

陈文炯, 卢辰, 周祥超   

  1. 大连理工大学 船舶工程学院 大连 116023
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-27 修回日期:2022-11-06 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-06
  • 作者简介:陈文炯(1985-),男,博士,副教授/博士生导师; 研究方向:机械振动与噪声控制; 陈文炯,大连理工大学船舶工程学院副教授,博士生导师; 2008年在大连理工大学力学系获得学士学位,2014年获得大连理工大学工程力学专业博士学位; 2014年至2016年在大连理工大学船舶工程学院进行博士后研究,期间(2015年至2016年)在悉尼大学开展合作研究; 其长期致力于减振降噪材料/结构多尺度优化设计,以及面向增材制造的结构拓扑优化设计等研究工作; 主持国家重点研发计划课题、JW创新项目与国家自然科学基金项目等近10项,发表学术论文40余篇,SCI索引20余篇,5年内SCI他引250余次,授权国家发明专利10余项; 卢辰(1998-),男,硕士研究生; 研究方向:水下覆盖层分析与设计; 周祥超(1995-),男,硕士研究生; 研究方向:水下覆盖层分析与设计。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目“低频耐压吸声覆盖层结构多尺度拓扑优化设计方法”(12072058)

Analysis on the Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure on the Performance of Acoustic Coating

CHEN Wenjiong, LU Chen, ZHOU Xiangchao   

  1. School of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China
  • Received:2022-09-27 Revised:2022-11-06 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-06

摘要: 该文考虑静压作用产生的空腔变形及其预应力状态,建立空腔型吸声覆盖层吸声性能分析方法,研究静压作用对吸声覆盖层性能的影响规律。通过有限元法对比在相同静压下仅考虑空腔变形以及考虑空腔变形和同时存在预应力时的覆盖层吸声性能,进而研究了不同静压下含圆柱形、圆锥形和喇叭形空腔覆盖层在孔隙率相同时,覆盖层的最大变形量、平均吸声系数和吸声系数变化量等性能参数的差异。结果表明:仅考虑空腔变形以及考虑空腔变形和存在预应力时覆盖层的吸声性能有明显差异。静压使圆柱形空腔覆盖层的变形量最大,其次是喇叭形空腔覆盖层,圆锥形空腔覆盖层的最大变形量最小。静压对于3类覆盖层在2 000 Hz频率点以下的影响较小。随着静压的增加,圆柱形和圆锥形空腔的吸声系数曲线逐渐靠近,在10 MPa下几乎重合。

关键词: 静压, 吸声覆盖层, 空腔变形, 预应力, 吸声性能

Abstract: An analytical method for the sound absorption performance of the acoustic coating with cavities has been proposed to investigate the effect of the hydrostatic pressure on the performance of the acoustic coating with the consideration of the deformation and prestress of the cavities. By using the finite element method, the sound absorption performance of the acoustic coating that only considers the deformation of the cavities is compared with that of the acoustic coating that considers the deformation and prestress of the cavities under the same hydrostatic pressure. The differences of the maximum deformation, average absorption coefficient and absorption coefficient variation are then studied for the acoustic coating with cylinder, conical and horn cavities under the same porosity and different hydrostatic pressure. The results show that there are significant differences between the sound absorption performance of the acoustic coating that only considers the deformation of the cavities and that of the acoustic coating that considers the deformation and prestress of the cavities. The hydrostatic pressure causes the largest deformation of the coating with cylinder cavities, followed by the coating with horn cavities, and then the coating with conical cavities. The effect of the hydrostatic pressure on the acoustic coating can be neglected below 2000 Hz. The absorption coefficient curves of the acoustic coating with cylinder cavities and conical cavities gradually get closer with the increase of the hydrostatic pressure, and almost match to each other under 10 MPa hydrostatic pressure.

Key words: hydrostatic pressure, acoustic coating, cavity deformation, prestress, absorbing performance

中图分类号: