船用风帆流固耦合研究进展

doi:10.19423/j.cnki.31-1561/u.2022.05.038

船舶 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (05): 38-47.DOI: 10.19423/j.cnki.31-1561/u.2022.05.038

船用风帆流固耦合研究进展

周睿¹, 岳桢², 陈顺华^1,3, 孙鹏楠^1,3

1.中山大学海洋工程与技术学院珠海 519000;
2.武汉理工大学船海与能源动力学院武汉 430063;
3.南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室（珠海）珠海 519000

收稿日期:2022-06-16 修回日期:2022-06-29 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-10-27
作者简介:周睿（1998-）,男,硕士研究生。研究方向：计算力学,新能源装备性能。岳桢（2000-）,男,本科。研究方向：新能源装备性能。陈顺华（1987-）,男,博士,副教授。研究方向：计算力学,新能源装备性能。孙鹏楠（1991-）,男,博士,副教授。研究方向：流固耦合,计算力学。
基金资助:
广东省自然科学基金面上项目（2022A1515011155）

Research Progress on Fluid-Structure Interaction of Ship Sails

ZHOU Rui¹, YUE Zhen², CHEN Shunhua^1,3, SUN Pengnan^1,3

1. School of Ocean Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China;
2. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
3. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519000, China);

Received:2022-06-16 Revised:2022-06-29 Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-10-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 船用风帆与空气流场的相互作用属于典型的流固耦合问题,近年来受到高度关注,研究船用风帆的流固耦合力学行为对风帆的结构优化设计和船舶的动力性能提升具有重要意义。为全面了解当前船用风帆流固耦合问题的研究现状,该文从数值模拟和试验研究两方面对现有相关文献进行了梳理：从空气流场、风帆结构、流固耦合3个方面对所采用的数值方法进行了归纳总结, 从全尺寸和缩比模型试验2个角度对现有试验方法进行归类分析;通过对比不同研究方法的优缺点,分析和探讨了船用风帆流固耦合未来的研究方向。

关键词: 船用风帆, 流固耦合, 数值模拟, 试验研究

Abstract: The interaction between ship sails and the air flow field is a typical fluid-structure interaction problem, which has attracted great attention in recent years. Research on the mechanical behavior of the fluid-structure interaction for ship sails is of great significance to the structural optimization design of the sails and the improvement of the ship dynamic performance. In order to fully understand the state-of-the-art of the fluid-structure interaction of ship sails, the current relevant literatures have been reviewed from the aspects of numerical simulation and experimental research. The adopted numerical methods are summarized from three aspects of air flow field, sail structure, and fluid-structure interaction. The current experimental methods are classified and analyzed from the viewpoints of the full-scale and model-scale tests. The future research direction of the fluid-structure interaction of ship sails is analyzed and discussed by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of different methods.

Key words: ship sails, fluid-structure interaction, numerical simulation, experimental research

中图分类号:

U674.926

周睿, 岳桢, 陈顺华, 孙鹏楠. 船用风帆流固耦合研究进展[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(05): 38-47.

ZHOU Rui, YUE Zhen, CHEN Shunhua, SUN Pengnan. Research Progress on Fluid-Structure Interaction of Ship Sails[J]. Ship & Boat, 2022, 33(05): 38-47.

参考文献

[1] 邹和荫. 大型船舶应当发展风帆[J].天津航海,1992(2):33-34.
[2] 汪洋, 王志华, 陈爱国.风帆助航的研究与应用综述[J]. 广州航海学院学报,2017(1):5-8.
[3] 何建海,胡以怀,张建霞,等.风能在船舶上的应用现状及展望[J].船舶工程,2013(5):112-115.
[4] 方泽江,谭俊哲,纪光英,等.逆风条件下柔性风帆性能的流固耦合研究[J].中国舰船研究, 2022, 17:1-7.
[5] MILGRAM J H.The aerodynamics of sails[C]// Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamic. 1968.
[6] MILGRAM J H.The analytical design of yacht sails[C]// The Annual Meeting of The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. 1968.
[7] GENTRY A.The aerodynamics of sail interaction[C]// Proceedings of the third AIAA Symposium on the Aero/Hydronautics of Sailing. 1971.
[8] LEE Y W, MIYATA H, SATO T.CFD simulation of two-sail interaction about a sailing yacht[J] . Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1997, 181: 25-34.
[9] HEDGES K, RICHARDS P, MALLINSON G.Computer modelling of downwind sails[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1996, 63: 95-110.
[10] RICHTER H J, HORRIGAN K C, BRAUN J.Computational fluid dynamics for downwind sails[C]// SNAME 16th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium. 2003.
[11] BENARD P, VIRé A, MOUREAU V, et al.Large-Eddy Simulation of wind turbines wakes including geometrical effects[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2018, 173: 133-139.
[12] SPALART P R.Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach[C]// Proceedings of first AFOSR international conference on DNS/LES. 1997.
[13] AUGIER B, BOT P, HAUVILLE F, et al.Dynamic behaviour of a flexible yacht sail plan[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 66:32-43.
[14] RENZSH H, GRAF K.Fluid structure interaction simulation of spinnakers getting closer to reality[C]// International Conference on Innovation in High Performance Sailing Yachts. 2010.
[15] CHAPIN V, CARLAN N D, HEPPEL P.Performance optimization of interacting sails through fluid structure coupling[J]. International Journal of Small Craft Technology, 2011, 153: 103-116.
[16] MORVAN A, SACHER M, NêME A, et al. Efficient jib-mainsail fluid-structure interaction modelling-Validations with semi-rigid sails experiments[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 243: 110210.
[17] BAK S, YOO J, SONG C Y.Fluid-structure interaction analysis of deformation of sail of 30-foot yacht[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2013(2): 263-276.
[18] CALì M, OLIVERI S M, CELLA U, et al.Mechanical characterization and modeling of downwind sailcloth in fluid-structure interaction analysis[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 165: 488-504.
[19] SACHER M, LEROUX J-B, NêME A, et al. A fast and robust approach to compute nonlinear Fluid-Structure Interactions on yacht sails-Application to a semi-rigid composite mainsail[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 201: 107139.
[20] DURAND M, LEROYER A, LOTHODé C, et al.FSI investigation on stability of downwind sails with an automatic dynamic trimming[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 90: 129-139.
[21] BAK S, YOO J.FSI analysis on the sail performance of a yacht with rig deformation[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2019(2): 648-661.
[22] HÜBNER B, WALHORN E, DINKLER D. A monolithic approach to fluid-structure interaction using space-time finite elements[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 193:2087-2104.
[23] D'UBALDO O, GHELARDI S, RIZZO C M. FSI simulations for sailing yacht high performance appendages[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2021(2): 200-215.
[24] LOMBARDI M, CREMONESI M, GIAMPIERI A, et al.A strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction model for wind-sail simulation[C]// RINA International Conference on High Performance Yacht Design. 2012.
[25] LOMBARDI M, PAROLINI N, QUARTERONI A, et al.Numerical simulation of sailing boats: dynamics, FSI, and shape optimization[M]. Variational Analysis and Aerospace Engineering: Mathematical Challenges for Aerospace Design. Springer. 2012: 339-377.
[26] DURAND M.Interaction fluide-structure souple et legere: application aux voiliers [D]. Nantes: Ecole centrale de Nantes, 2012.
[27] CIRELLO A, INGRASSIA T, MANCUSO A, et al.Improving the Downwind Sail Design Process by Means of a Novel FSI Approach[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021(6): 624.
[28] AUGIER B, BOT P, HAUVILLE F, et al.Experimental validation of unsteady models for fluid structure interaction: Application to yacht sails and rigs[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012, 101: 53-66.
[29] DEPARDAY J, AUGIER B, BOT P.Experimental analysis of a strong fluid-structure interaction on a soft membrane—Application to the flapping of a yacht downwind sail[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2018, 81: 547-564.
[30] DEPARDAY J.Experimental studies of fluid-structure interaction on downwind sails [D]. Brest: Université de Bretagne occidentale-Brest, 2016.
[31] BOT P, VIOLA I M, FLAY R G, et al.Wind-tunnel pressure measurements on model-scale rigid downwind sails[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 90: 84-92.
[32] YOO J, KIM H T.Computational and experimental study on performance of sails of a yacht[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2006(10): 1322-1342.
[33] GHELARDI S, FREDA A, RIZZO C M, et al.A Fluid-Structure Interaction case study on a square sail in a wind tunnel[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 163: 136-147.
[34] AUBIN N, AUGIER B, DEPARDAY J, et al.Performance enhancement of downwind sails due to leading edge flapping: A wind tunnel investigation[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 169: 370-378.
[35] SMITH M J, PATON J, MORVAN H, et al.Capturing sail shape in a wind tunnel environment[J]. The Photogrammetric Record, 2012, 138: 195-209.

编辑推荐

Metrics

联系电话：（021）63161688-105006
传真：（021）63151255
E-mail：chuanbo@maric.com.cn

船用风帆流固耦合研究进展

Research Progress on Fluid-Structure Interaction of Ship Sails

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	胡扬帆, 丁仕风, 刘志兵, 周利, 吴刚, 曹晶. 极地船液舱温度场分析与冻结过程模拟[J]. 船舶, 2023, 34(01): 110-118.
[2]	李兆辉, 胡帆, 吴琼, 冯毅, 孙群. 9 400 TEU集装箱船实尺度自航性能数值模拟[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(05): 59-72.
[3]	胡开业, 赵宾, 周辉, 毛丽君. 迎浪中ONR内倾船参数横摇抑制措施研究[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(04): 116-123.
[4]	张恒, 王仁智, 蔡佑林, 于存银. 喷射流浸没深度对喷水推进尾迹场的影响分析[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(03): 20-27.
[5]	李小军, 沈杰, 刘寒秋. 弹性螺旋桨-轴双向流固耦合计算[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(03): 58-66.
[6]	孟庆元, 王长军, 罗立臣. 新型气体驱动搅拌器的数值模拟和实验研究[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(03): 126-131.
[7]	纪世君, 倪其军, 蒋一. 断阶对超高速气动增升船水气动力特性影响的数值研究[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(01): 39-47.
[8]	孟庆元, 韩鹏, 刘江歌. 海洋修井机泥浆搅拌器设计优化[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(01): 117-121.
[9]	朱枭猛, 李彬, 郭兴乾. 动力定位深海采矿船作业过程数值分析[J]. 船舶, 2021, 32(05): 94-104.
[10]	臧戈, 王硕, 熊炳旭, 穆建树, 姜福洪. 某型FPSO内转塔通风系统设计及数值模拟[J]. 船舶, 2021, 32(04): 43-48.
[11]	王志斌, 徐强, 奚英奇, 王果, 姜圣俊, 韩灿. 大型船舶系泊模式设计及优化研究[J]. 船舶, 2020, 31(02): 116-126.
[12]	于海;封培元;熊小青;吴琼;何佳益;. 中型豪华游船波浪增阻数值模拟分析[J]. 船舶, 2019, 30(01): 99-104.
[13]	戴原星;张志远;刘建国;王金宝;. 喷水推进三体船阻力与自航数值模拟研究[J]. 船舶, 2019, 30(01): 105-111.
[14]	李云波;朱潇鹏;王桂冠;秦安阳;张大棚;. 考虑壁面润滑力的微气泡减阻数值模拟研究[J]. 船舶, 2018, 29(S1): 92-97.
[15]	冯丰;安毓辉;. 船舶驾驶室玻璃窗除霜系统设计[J]. 船舶, 2018, 29(05): 5-10.