船用SCR技术现状及发展

doi:10.19423/j.cnki.31-1561/u.2023.04.069

船舶 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (04): 69-80.DOI: 10.19423/j.cnki.31-1561/u.2023.04.069

船用SCR技术现状及发展

林睿, 彭佳杰, 贺天智, 王树信, 童雨舟, 陈勇, 代黎博

中国船舶及海洋工程设计研究院上海 200011

收稿日期:2022-10-21 修回日期:2022-12-12 出版日期:2023-08-25 发布日期:2023-08-24
作者简介:林睿（1996-）,男,硕士,助理工程师。研究方向：大气环境控制及船舶室内空气调节。彭佳杰（1995-）,男,硕士,助理工程师。研究方向：船舶与海洋工程空调、冷藏、通风设计与研发。贺天智（1995-）,男,硕士,助理工程师。研究方向：船舶新能源、船舶节能。王树信（1993-）,男,硕士,助理工程师。研究方向：船舶与海洋工程空调、冷藏、通风设计与研发。童雨舟（1992-）,男,本科,工程师。研究方向：船舶与海洋工程空调、冷藏、通风设计与研发。陈勇（1992-）,男,硕士,工程师。研究方向：船舶与海洋工程空调、冷藏、通风设计与研发。代黎博（1996-）,男,硕士,助理工程师。研究方向：船舶与海洋工程空调、冷藏、通风设计与研发。

State-of-the-Art and Development of Marine SCR Technology

LIN Rui, PENG Jiajie, HE Tianzhi, WANG Shuxin, TONG Yuzhou, CHEN Yong, DAI Libo

Marine Design & Research Institute of China, Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2022-10-21 Revised:2022-12-12 Online:2023-08-25 Published:2023-08-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 船用选择性催化还原（selective catalytic reduction, SCR）技术是1项高效的NO_X脱除技术,已经在船舶领域得到了广泛应用,但随着环保要求调整与能源结构的变化,船用SCR技术也需要相应调整。目前船用SCR多使用尿素-选择性催化还原（Urea-SCR）技术,此技术受船用燃料油中杂质及烟气排气温度影响较大。其中,船用燃料油中的硫（S）及碱性金属等物质含量高,对催化剂的毒副作用明显,限制了船用SCR的使用。船舶主要使用柴油机,决定了烟气排气温度变化区间,通过影响尿素水解产NH₃效果、SCR反应器布置形式及催化剂活性,最终影响尾气脱硝效果。上述现状表明,使用船用燃料油的船舶,带废气加热的LP-SCR系统设计将是SCR设计的重要方向;寻找产NH₃效率高及控制精确的安全NH₃源（或方式）,对于船用SCR系统发展也起到了至关重要的作用;提高燃料品质、降低烟气中毒副作用限制,可为研制发展船用新型低温、抗毒催化剂提供基础。由于碳中和目标,低碳、零碳燃料船舶将是全球趋势,使得燃烧后排气不同,进而导致SCR控制技术变化。零碳、低碳燃料组分单一且具有还原性,还具备作为SCR还原剂的潜力,因此利用燃料自身还原NO_X的一体化处理SCR技术,将成为碳中和目标下船舶SCR发展的重要方向。

关键词: 柴油机, 氮氧化物, 后处理技术, 选择性催化还原

Abstract: Marine selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology is an efficient NO_X removal technology, which has been widely applied in shipbuilding industry. However, the marine SCR technology also needs to be adjusted with the continuous improvement of the environmental requirements and the changes in marine energy structure. Nowadays, most marine SCR technology uses Urea-SCR technology, which is greatly affected by impurities in the marine fuel oils and the temperature of the exhaust. The high level of sulfur and alkali metals in the marine fuel oils has significant toxicity on catalysts, limiting the use of marine SCR. The diesel engine that mainly used on ships determines the range of the temperature change of the exhaust, which finally affects the denitrification of the exhaust gas through the influence on the effect of urea hydrolysis to produce ammonia, the layout of the SCR rectors and the catalyst activity. The above situation indicates that the design of an LP-SCR system with exhaust gas heating will be an important direction of the design of the SCR for the ships using marine fuel oils as fuel. It is critical to find safe source or method of supplying ammonia with high production efficiency and precise control for the development of marine SCR systems. Improving the fuel quality and reducing the toxicity effect in the smoke can provide a foundation for the research and development of new low-temperature and anti-toxic catalysts. The low-carbon and zero-carbon fuels become a global trend due to carbon neutrality, resulting in different exhaust emissions after combustion and then the change of SCR control technology. The zero-carbon and low-carbon fuels have single and reducible composition, and have the potential to be SCR reducing agents. The integrated processing SCR technology that uses the fuels itself for NO_X removal will become an important direction for the development of marine SCR under the goal of carbon neutrality.

Key words: diesel engine, nitrogen oxides, after treatment, selective catalytic reduction(SCR)

中图分类号:

林睿, 彭佳杰, 贺天智, 王树信, 童雨舟, 陈勇, 代黎博. 船用SCR技术现状及发展[J]. 船舶, 2023, 34(04): 69-80.

LIN Rui, PENG Jiajie, HE Tianzhi, WANG Shuxin, TONG Yuzhou, CHEN Yong, DAI Libo. State-of-the-Art and Development of Marine SCR Technology[J]. Ship & Boat, 2023, 34(04): 69-80.

参考文献

[1] 2021年中国移动源环境管理年报(摘录二)[J]. 环境保护, 2021(19): 60-70.
[2] 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 中国移动源环境管理年报(2022年) [R]. 2022.
[3] 杨捷波, 高占斌, 宋佳, 等. 掺水乳化油对船用柴油机性能影响优化分析[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2021(19): 102-107.
[4] 王科, 赵昌普, 蔡玉洁. 富氧燃烧与EGR对船用柴油机NO-碳烟排放和燃烧特性的影响[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2020(3): 248-256.
[5] 马志豪, 陈占耀, 贾义, 等. 小功率非道路用柴油机动力、经济及排放特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017(21): 78-84.
[6] QU J, FENG Y, ZHU Y, et al.Design and thermodynamic analysis of a combined system including steam Rankine cycle, organic Rankine cycle, and power turbine for marine low-speed diesel engine waste heat recovery[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 245: 114580.
[7] WU B, JIA Z, LI Z G, et al.Different exhaust temperature management technologies for heavy-duty diesel engines with regard to thermal efficiency[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 186: 116495.
[8] BAYRAMOĞLU K, ÖZMEN G. Design and performance evaluation of low-speed marine diesel engine selective catalytic reduction system[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 155: 184-196.
[9] 金玉山. 船用低速柴油机SCR喷雾及反应仿真分析[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2016.
[10] 金玉山, 李虎生, 刘猛. 船用SCR系统尿素溶液喷嘴试验分析比较[J]. 柴油机, 2015(1): 17-20, 45.
[11] 宋鑫. 基于多因素角度分析喷射结构对船机SCR的影响[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2014(11): 172-175.
[12] 王满, 张洪朋, 付洪发. 船舶SCR系统陶瓷催化-过滤器烟气正向流动状态仿真与结构优化[J]. 船舶工程, 2017(8): 60-64.
[13] 朱元清. 船用低速柴油机SCR技术的发展与应用[J]. 船舶工程, 2020(10): 12-17.
[14] LIU T, WEI L, YAO Y, et al.La promoted CuO-MnOx catalysts for optimizing SCR performance of NO with CO[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2021, 546: 148971.
[15] SAVVA Z, PETALLIDOU K C, DAMASKINOS C M, et al.H₂-SCR of NO_X on low-SSA CeO₂-supported Pd: the effect of Pd particle size[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2021, 615: 118062.
[16] MENDES A N, ZHOLOBENKO V L, THIBAULT-STARZYK F, et al.On the enhancing effect of Ce in Pd-MOR catalysts for NO_X CH₄-SCR: A structure-reactivity study[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 195: 121-131.
[17] 叶青, 闫立娜, 霍飞飞, 等. Fe柱撑海泡石负载Cu催化剂:结构特点及其C₃H₆选择性催化还原NO催化性质[J]. 无机化学学报, 2012(1): 103-112.
[18] DAMMA D, ETTIREDDY P R, REDDY B M, et al.A review of low temperature NH₃-SCR for removal of NO_X[J]. Catalysts, 2019(4): 349.
[19] 金瑞奔. 负载型Mn-Ce系列低温SCR脱硝催化剂制备、反应机理及抗硫性能研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2010.
[20] QING M, SU S, WANG L, et al.Getting insight into the oxidation of SO₂ to SO₃ over V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalysts: reaction mechanism and effects of NO and NH₃[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 361: 1215-1224.
[21] MAGNUSSON M, FRIDELL E, INGELSTEN H H. The influence of sulfur dioxide and water on the performance of a marine SCR catalyst[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 111/112: 20-26.
[22] WIJAYANTI K, ANDONOVA S, KUMAR A, et al. Impact of sulfur oxide on NH₃-SCR over Cu-SAPO-34[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2015, 166/167: 568-579.
[23] WIJAYANTI K, LEISTNER K, CHAND S, et al.Deactivation of Cu-SSZ-13 by SO₂ exposure under SCR conditions[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2016(8): 2565-2579.
[24] SHI Y, TAN S, WANG X, et al.Regeneration of sulfur-poisoned CeO₂ catalyst for NH₃-SCR of NO_X[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2016, 86: 67-71.
[25] SHEN M, WANG Z, LI X, et al.Effects of regeneration conditions on sulfated CuSSZ-13 catalyst for NH₃-SCR[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019(8): 1249-1257.
[26] JIANG Y, LAI C, LI Q, et al.The poisoning effect of KCl and K₂O on CeO₂-TiO₂ catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃[J]. Fuel, 2020, 280: 118638.
[27] 王晨, 陈泽翔, 王建强, 等. 基于NH₃-SCR反应铜基小孔分子筛催化剂Na中毒对比研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020(12): 5551-5560.
[28] ZHU N, SHAN W, SHAN Y, et al.Effects of alkali and alkaline earth metals on Cu-SSZ-39 catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO_X with NH₃[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 388: 124250.
[29] KONG M, LIU Q, ZHOU J, et al.Effect of different potassium species on the deactivation of V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ SCR catalyst: comparison of K₂SO₄, KCl and K₂O[J]. chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 348: 637-643.
[30] LI X, LI X, YANG R T, et al.The poisoning effects of calcium on V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst for the SCR reaction: comparison of different forms of calcium[J]. Molecular Catalysis, 2017, 434: 16-24.
[31] 闫东杰, 李亚静, 玉亚, 等. 碱金属沉积对Mn-Ce/TiO₂低温SCR催化剂性能影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2018(12): 1513-1519.
[32] NICOSIA D, CZEKAJ I, KRÖCHER O. Chemical deactivation of V₂O₅/WO₃-TiO₂ SCR catalysts by additives and impurities from fuels, lubrication oils and urea solution: part II. characterization study of the effect of alkali and alkaline earth metals[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008(3): 228-236.
[33] LI X, LI J, PENG Y, et al.Mechanism of arsenic poisoning on SCR catalyst of CeW/Ti and its novel efficient regeneration method with hydrogen[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 184: 246-257.
[34] 石晓燕, 丁世鹏, 贺泓, 等. 改进钒基SCR脱硝催化剂的抗碱金属中毒性能[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014(5): 2031-2034.
[35] 沈伯雄, 施建伟, 杨婷婷, 等. 选择性催化还原脱氮催化剂的再生及其应用评述[J]. 化工进展, 2008(1): 64-67.
[36] 唐韬, 李懋, 张婷, 等. 柴油机SCR系统催化器温度场试验解析[J]. 内燃机与动力装置, 2017(2): 1-4.
[37] TURCO M, LISI L, PIRONE R, et al.Effect of water on the kinetics of nitric oxide reduction over a high-surface-area V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1994(2): 133-149.
[38] 唐韬, 赵彦光, 华伦, 等. 柴油机SCR系统尿素水溶液喷雾分解的试验研究[J]. 内燃机工程, 2015(1): 1-5.
[39] 莫春兰, 莫益涛, 陈俊红, 等. 柴油机SCR系统尿素的热分解过程研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2021(1): 16-22.
[40] BONFILS A, CREFF Y, LEPREUX O, et al.Closed-loop control of a SCR system using a NO_X sensor cross-sensitive to NH₃[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2014(2): 368-378.
[41] 刘颖帅, 胡广地, 齐宝华. 固态SCR技术降低柴油机尾气NO_X的排放[J]. 环境工程学报, 2021(2): 626-634.
[42] 吕炎, 张文涛, 赵超, 等. 船舶低速机低压SCR系统设计难点分析[C]//2016中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集(第三卷), 海口, 2016: 541-546.
[43] 中国船级社. 选择性催化还原(SCR)系统船上应用指南[S]. 北京: 中国船级社, 2022.
[44] 王耀霖. 船舶尾气高效脱硝系统的开发与优化[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2017.
[45] 殷华兵, 王伟彬. 远洋船舶NO_X废气处理系统SCR选型及实船安装[J]. 船舶与海洋工程, 2019(1): 43-50.
[46] DU X, GAO X, FU Y, et al.The co-effect of Sb and Nb on the SCR performance of the V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2012(1):406-412.
[47] 刘雪松, 汪澜, 房晶瑞, 等. 水热处理和钨添加对低钒催化剂高温脱硝性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2020(4): 1363-1370.
[48] CHEN L, LI J, GE M.Promotional effect of Ce-doped V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ with low vanadium loadings for selective catalytic reduction of NO_X by NH₃[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009(50): 21177-21184.
[49] ZHANG L, WANG D, LIU Y, et al. SO₂ poisoning impact on the NH₃-SCR reaction over a commercial Cu-SAPO-34 SCR catalyst[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 156/157: 371-377.
[50] 孟鹏通, 范超, 吕文婷, 等. 整体式堇青石负载的Cu-SSZ-13分子筛催化剂的制备及其氨选择性催化还原脱硝性能[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2020(10): 1216-1223.
[51] 赵欣, 黄垒, 李红蕊, 等. 过渡金属(Cu, Fe, Mn, Co)改性高分散V₂O₅/TiO₂作为高效NH₃-SCR脱硝催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2015(11): 1886-1899.
[52] 张晨光,封硕,邢玉烨,等.柴油车用NH₃-SCR铜基分子筛催化剂孤立态Cu²+研究进展[J].化工进展, 2023(3): 1321-1331.
[53] 时屹然. 基于结构优化MnCoO_X催化剂的NH₃-SCR机理及抗硫抗碱机制研究[D]. 北京:北京科技大学, 2021.
[54] 杨晓帆, 唐为勇, 陈海波, 等. 铜基菱沸石催化剂——适用于未来中国柴油车排放法规的选择性催化还原技术[J]. 内燃机工程, 2016(6): 72-78.
[55] 施赟, 王晓祥, 李素静, 等. 柴油车NH₃选择性催化还原NO_X催化剂研究进展[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2019(1): 10-20.
[56] 李新华. 车用Cu/SSZ-13 NH₃-SCR催化剂可控制备及硫中毒、再生机制研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2020.
[57] HU G, YANG J, TIAN Y, et al.Effect of Ce doping on the resistance of Na over V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ SCR catalysts[J]. Materials Research Bulletin, 2018, 104: 112-118.
[58] 鲍强, 周昊, 刘建成, 等. 新型CeO₂-V₂O₅/TiO₂-SiO₂催化剂高效抗碱金属中毒性能[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015(10): 1855-1862.
[59] CHEN Y, WANG M, DU X, et al.High resistance to Na poisoning of the V₂O₅-Ce(SO₄)₂/TiO₂ catalyst for the NO SCR reaction[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2018(12): 2948-2955.
[60] 谢巧, 张雷, 胡正华, 等. 低温NH₃-SCR反应中催化剂形貌效应的研究进展[J]. 工业催化, 2021(4): 28-34.
[61] 郭鹏翔. 氢发动机EGR与多次喷射耦合电子控制系统研究[D]. 郑州:华北水利水电大学, 2020.
[62] 姚春德, 陈超, 姚安仁, 等. 基于DMCC发动机台架的甲醇-SCR催化还原NO_X的研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2020(2): 498-506.
[63] 张肖肖. 富氧条件下氢气选择催化还原汽车尾气氮氧化物的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019(3): 1362-1370.
[64] PATEL V K, SHARMA S.Effect of oxide supports on palladium based catalysts for NO reduction by H₂-SCR[J]. Catalysis Today, 2021, 375: 591-600.
[65] OKAFOR E C, SOMARATHNE K D K A, HAYAKAWA A, et al. Towards the development of an efficient low-NO_X ammonia combustor for a micro gas turbine[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019(4): 4597-4606.

编辑推荐

Metrics

联系电话：（021）63161688-105006
传真：（021）63151255
E-mail：chuanbo@maric.com.cn

船用SCR技术现状及发展

State-of-the-Art and Development of Marine SCR Technology

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘建安. 新型W-X系列智能柴油机的气阀换气控制模块浅析[J]. 船舶, 2022, 33(01): 105-110.
[2]	袁金永, 杨帆. 高速巡逻船湿式排气系统设计[J]. 船舶, 2021, 32(04): 94-99.
[3]	李国祥, 王海燕. 海上自主水面船对主动力系统的基本要求[J]. 船舶, 2021, 32(02): 43-47.
[4]	李银涛, 赵楠. 日趋严格的尾气排放限值下的燃料选择及分析[J]. 船舶, 2020, 31(05): 111-120.
[5]	孙未. 基于船舶加热系统的缸套水废热回收设计[J]. 船舶, 2020, 31(02): 52-57.
[6]	鲁建, 霍海鳌, 陶富平. 大洋勘探船柴油机排气系统设计探索[J]. 船舶, 2019, 30(06): 65-71.
[7]	濮骏, 许金波, 王竟宇. SCR系统尿素舱在运输船上布置研究[J]. 船舶, 2019, 30(04): 115-119.
[8]	陆威崙;. MTU2000/4000系列推进柴油机的轮机设计特点[J]. 船舶, 2019, 30(02): 35-39.
[9]	武治江;邵诗逸;乌云翔;徐清华;高鹏;. 船用直流组网系统的特点和实际案例分析[J]. 船舶, 2018, 29(S1): 65-71.
[10]	吴磊;李康康;许婉莹;. 长航6000 m~3耙吸挖泥船柴油机排放控制系统配置分析[J]. 船舶, 2018, 29(05): 134-143.
[11]	王井丰;. 柴油机船舶机舱通风设计中若干问题探讨[J]. 船舶, 2017, 28(06): 63-66.
[12]	胡继敏;刘海松;李翔;. 船用柴油机排气系统联锁保护功能改进设计[J]. 船舶, 2016, 27(05): 64-68.
[13]	范凯;. 某船柴油机推进系统控制策略优化研究[J]. 船舶, 2015, 26(02): 64-69.
[14]	游哲锐;. 柴油机双燃料系统风险分析与评估[J]. 船舶, 2015, 26(02): 70-73.
[15]	高炳;赵自奇;. 控制船机废气排放的绿色水运技术分析[J]. 船舶, 2014, 25(05): 17-23.